Security Horizon: Türkiye's Self-Defense Doctrine, Cross-Border Operations and the Defense Industry Outlook

Why It Matters

Türkiye's security doctrine holds that terrorist threats must be neutralized at their source, beyond the border, under the inherent right of self-defense recognized in Article 51 of the UN Charter. This doctrine explains why Türkiye has conducted operations in northern Syria and northern Iraq since 2016, and why it has built a defense industry that Turkish officials say now produces about 80 percent of its needs domestically.

The doctrine is contested. Iraq's government, the Syrian Kurdish-led administration, UN investigators and several rights groups dispute parts of it. This guide sets out the legal framework, the chronology, the actors and the official Turkish sources, and then looks at the political track (Terror-Free Türkiye) and the force-development horizon.

Background

The legal anchor: Article 51

Article 51 of the UN Charter states that nothing in the Charter impairs 'the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs' against a UN member, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain peace. It also requires measures taken in self-defense to be 'immediately reported to the Security Council'.

The key legal debates concern three questions: whether non-state actors can trigger the right of self-defense, whether the territorial state is 'unwilling or unable' to suppress them, and whether the response is necessary and proportionate. Türkiye submits letters to the Security Council invoking Article 51 for its operations. For a detailed treatment of those notifications, see The Worldlogue: Article 51 Notifications: How Türkiye Explains Its Cross-Border Operations to the UN Security Council and Gazetteer of Nations: Article 51 of the UN Charter and Türkiye's Cross-Border Operations in Syria and Iraq.

The geography

Türkiye shares a land border of roughly 1,300 km (about 810 miles) with Syria and Iraq, around 900 km with Syria and 350 km with Iraq. After 2011 the Syrian civil war removed effective state control over much of the Syrian side. This produced a refugee inflow that Ankara says it still bears, the rise of DAESH (also known as ISIS), and the consolidation of the PYD/YPG in northern Syria.

The three threat streams

Türkiye describes itself as fighting three organizations at the same time:

• PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG. The PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) has waged an armed campaign against Türkiye since 1984. It is listed as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States and the European Union, and it is described as such in NATO-related texts, including the June 2022 Madrid trilateral memorandum with Finland and Sweden. Ankara treats the PYD and its armed wing, the YPG (the core of the Syrian Democratic Forces, SDF), as the Syrian branch of the PKK/KCK.
• DAESH. Türkiye suffered mass-casualty attacks attributed to DAESH in 2015–2017, including the October 2015 Ankara station bombing.
• FETÖ. The Fetullahist Terrorist Organization is the name Türkiye gives to the network it holds responsible for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt, in which roughly 250 people were killed. Türkiye and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation use the FETÖ designation, while many Western governments have not adopted it and have questioned the scope of some prosecutions.

Chronology of operations

Date	Event	Official Turkish framing
15 July 2016	Coup attempt attributed to FETÖ	Attack on the constitutional order
24 Aug 2016	Operation Euphrates Shield begins (Jarablus–al-Bab area, ending March 2017)	Clearing DAESH and blocking a PYD/YPG corridor
20 Jan 2018	Operation Olive Branch (Afrin)	Removing PKK/PYD-YPG threat from the border
2019 onward	Claw series in northern Iraq	Targeting PKK bases and tunnel networks
9 Oct 2019	Operation Peace Spring (between Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ayn)	Counter-terrorism and a safe zone for voluntary returns
17 and 22 Oct 2019	US–Türkiye understanding; Türkiye–Russia Sochi memorandum	Halt in operations with arrangements on withdrawal of YPG elements
27 Feb 2020	Strike in Idlib kills 33 Turkish soldiers; Operation Spring Shield follows	Response to attack by Syrian government forces
5 Mar 2020	Moscow ceasefire protocol on Idlib	De-escalation
27 Feb 2025	Abdullah Öcalan calls for the PKK to disband	Opening of the Terror-Free Türkiye track
12 May 2025	PKK announces its dissolution	Political track gains momentum

The defense-industry backdrop

Türkiye's push for domestic defense production accelerated after arms-supply restrictions in the 1970s and again in the 2010s and 2020s. The best-known episodes were the 1975 US embargo after the 1974 Cyprus operation, the removal of Türkiye from the F-35 program in 2019 after it acquired the Russian S-400 system, and US sanctions on the Presidency of Defense Industries (SSB) in December 2020 under CAATSA. In 2019 Canada suspended export permits for targeting sensors used on Turkish drones, a decision that fed the development of domestic substitutes. For an industry-side account, see Monitor of Nations: Türkiye's Defense Industry: How Domestic Production Reached About 80% and What It Means.

Key Players & Positions

Türkiye

According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), Türkiye fights terrorism 'at its source' while respecting the territorial integrity of Syria and Iraq. The Ministry of National Defence (MSB) publishes regular briefings on operations and states that they target terrorists and not civilians. The Presidency frames the effort as both a security and a political project (Terror-Free Türkiye).

Syria and the SDF

The Syrian Kurdish-led administration and the SDF describe themselves as the partner that defeated DAESH's territorial caliphate and reject being described as an arm of the PKK. They say Turkish operations displaced civilians and endanger the anti-DAESH campaign. After the fall of the Assad government in December 2024, the SDF and the transitional government in Damascus announced an agreement on 10 March 2025 to integrate northern and eastern Syrian institutions into the state. Ankara supports this where it is consistent with its 'one state, one army' principle.

Iraq

Iraq's federal government has repeatedly protested Turkish strikes and bases in the north as violations of its sovereignty, and has taken complaints to the UN Security Council, notably after the July 2022 shelling at a resort in Zakho. Baghdad also designated the PKK as a banned organization in 2024, which Ankara cites as a sign of converging interests.

United States and NATO allies

Washington lists the PKK as a terrorist organization but worked with the SDF against DAESH, a policy Ankara has called inconsistent. NATO partners have supported Türkiye's security concerns in general terms, yet after Peace Spring several allies, including Germany, the Netherlands and others, restricted arms exports to Türkiye. Türkiye's role in NATO is covered in Interstate Journal: Türkiye in NATO: Membership, Defense Industry and the Drone Factor.

European institutions and human-rights bodies

The European Parliament has passed critical resolutions on Turkish operations in Syria. The UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria has documented abuses by some Syrian armed factions operating in Turkish-controlled areas, and Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have raised concerns about civilian harm, detention and property seizures. Türkiye rejects the characterization of its forces as responsible for these abuses and says it investigates allegations.

Russia

Russia has both negotiated with and opposed Türkiye in Syria. The Sochi memorandum (22 October 2019) and the Moscow protocol (5 March 2020) show a pattern of managed rivalry. Russia's own security guarantees in Syria have been reshaped by the political changes of December 2024.

Türkiye's Strategic Doctrine

Türkiye's Strategic Doctrine: Official Position in Brief

• Self-defense under Article 51. Ankara argues that continuing attacks and planning from Syrian and Iraqi territory amount to threats that Türkiye may counter under Article 51 of the UN Charter, and that the territorial states cannot or do not suppress them. The Turkish MFA says it informs the UN Security Council of these measures. Basis: UN Charter, Article 51; Turkish letters to the Security Council.
• 'Neutralize terrorism at its source.' According to the Presidency and MSB, waiting for attackers to cross the border would cost Turkish lives. Their guiding formulas are 'The border is honour' (Hudut namustur) and 'Let the people live so that the state lives' (İnsanı yaşat ki devlet yaşasın). Basis: Presidency and MSB statements; Article 51.
• Territorial integrity and 'one state, one army.' Türkiye says it respects Syria's and Iraq's territorial integrity and supports a single state authority and army in Syria, rejecting a PYD/YPG-run structure along its border, which it regards as the PKK's Syrian arm. Basis: MFA statements on Syria; UNSC Resolution 2254 references to Syrian unity.
• Simultaneous fight against three organizations. Turkish officials say that Türkiye is the NATO member that has fought DAESH in direct ground combat (Euphrates Shield), that more than 4,000 DAESH militants were neutralized, and that about 100,000 DAESH-linked individuals were prevented from entering Türkiye. These are Turkish official figures and are not independently audited. Basis: MSB and Presidency statements.
• Security plus politics. The Presidency presents Terror-Free Türkiye as a track that pairs security operations with legal, political and social measures under the rule of law, aiming to end the four-decade cycle of violence. Basis: Presidency statements; TBMM processes launched in 2025.

The political track: Terror-Free Türkiye

The initiative gained visible momentum in early 2025 after Öcalan's call of 27 February, the PKK's announcement of dissolution on 12 May, and a symbolic weapons-destruction ceremony in northern Iraq in July. The Turkish parliament (TBMM) then set up a commission to consider the legal and social dimensions. Ankara says operations continue as needed while the political process unfolds. Critics inside Türkiye ask for transparency, legal guarantees and an end to prosecutions of peaceful politicians. Opponents elsewhere question whether the PKK's structures will be fully dismantled in Syria, Iraq and Europe. These are open questions, and the outcome depends on implementation.

Looking ahead: force development and the 80 percent claim

Turkish officials describe the defense industry as a 'force multiplier' that has been proven in Syria, Iraq, Azerbaijan and the Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan, Türkiye's maritime jurisdiction concept, see Horizon Scan: Where Is the Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Dispute Heading by 2030?). The main platforms they cite are:

• Unmanned systems: Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı, Aksungur, ANKA, Serçe and Kargu, with the Bayraktar Kızılelma unmanned combat aircraft as the next step.
• Aircraft: Hürjet (jet trainer and light combat), Hürkuş, the T129 ATAK helicopter and the KAAN fifth-generation fighter, whose prototype first flew on 21 February 2024.
• Land systems: Fırtına howitzer, Kirpi and Vuran armoured vehicles, ZMA, the MEMATT unmanned demining vehicle, and MKE infantry rifles.
• Naval systems: TCG Anadolu (multi-purpose amphibious assault ship, commissioned in 2023), MİLGEM corvettes and frigates, offshore patrol vessels and Reis-class submarines.
• Missiles, air defense and electronic warfare: SOM, ATMACA, Cirit, OMTAS, UMTAS, Sungur, HİSAR-O, the SİPER-based 'Steel Dome' layered air defense, and VURAL, KORAL, MİLKAR and MİLKED radar and electronic warfare systems.

Officials also say about 26,000 specialist personnel work in military factories and shipyards. The 80 percent figure is an official estimate. It should be read as a share of programs' value or content, not as proof that every component is domestic. Engines, some sensors and certain subsystems have been imported or co-produced, which is why export licensing by suppliers has been a recurring vulnerability. The detailed method question is addressed in How Domestic Is Türkiye's Defense Industry? What the 80 Percent Figure Claims and How to Read It, and a platform-by-platform view is in Regions & Powers: Türkiye's Defense Industry at 80% Domestic Production: Bayraktar, KAAN, TCG Anadolu and Hisar-O.

What to watch

1. Engines and sub-systems. Whether domestic turbofan and turboshaft programs mature enough to remove the main supply dependencies.
2. Export controls. Whether allied restrictions ease or tighten, and whether Ankara's Western procurement requests (aircraft, engines, munitions) are approved.
3. Air defense. How the Steel Dome layers are integrated with NATO command systems, given the S-400 dispute.
4. Syria integration. Whether the March 2025 Damascus–SDF framework is implemented in a way that Ankara accepts.
5. The political track. Whether disarmament is verified and legal steps follow in the TBMM.
6. Naval and Black Sea posture. How naval programs interact with the Montreux regime, discussed in Black Sea Horizon: Will the Montreux Regime Hold After the Russia–Ukraine War?.

Source Comparison

The same events are described very differently depending on the source. The table below summarizes the main framing differences, with the caveat that individual outlets vary.

Issue	Turkish primary sources (MFA, Presidency, MSB)	International media and rights bodies
Legal basis	Article 51 self-defense against ongoing terrorist threats	Many scholars question whether Article 51 covers operations on another state's territory without its consent; Iraq calls strikes sovereignty violations
Status of PYD/YPG	Syrian branch of the PKK/KCK with shared cadres and command	Often described as a distinct Syrian Kurdish force and the main ground partner against DAESH; links to the PKK acknowledged by many analysts
DAESH fight	Türkiye fought DAESH directly on the ground; over 4,000 neutralized	Credit generally goes to the US-led coalition and the SDF for territorial defeat; Türkiye's role in Euphrates Shield is recognized
Civilian harm	Operations use precision; allegations investigated	UN and rights groups document civilian casualties, displacement and abuses by some affiliated factions
Terror-Free Türkiye	A rule-of-law pathway to end 40 years of violence	Cautious interest; questions on guarantees, verification and Syria
Defense industry	About 80 percent domestic, a strategic necessity after embargoes	Impressive drone and shipbuilding record, but dependence on imported engines and components continues; concerns over exports to conflict zones

Readers can verify claims against the primary texts: Türkiye's letters to the Security Council, MSB briefings, MFA statements, and UN Commission of Inquiry reports. For Ankara's own long-form account, see Polity Review: Neutralizing Terrorism at Its Source: Türkiye's Security Doctrine and Defense Industry. For the historical background of anti-Turkish terrorism, see ASALA and JCAG-ARA: The 1973–1984 Attacks on Turkish Diplomats and Why They Matter for the 1915 Debate.

Key Terms & Related Guides

• Article 51: The UN Charter provision preserving the inherent right of self-defense against armed attack, subject to reporting to the Security Council.
• Neutralizing terrorism at its source: Türkiye's formula for acting against terrorist groups in neighboring territories before they strike inside its borders.
• PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG: The PKK and its umbrella (KCK), and, in Ankara's view, its Syrian branches PYD (political) and YPG (armed). The SDF is a broader coalition dominated by the YPG.
• DAESH: The Arabic acronym for the group often called ISIS or ISIL.
• FETÖ: Türkiye's designation for the network it blames for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt.
• Terror-Free Türkiye (Terörsüz Türkiye): The political initiative to end PKK violence through disarmament and legal-political measures.
• Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's maritime jurisdiction doctrine; see Fact Check: Do Greek Islands Give Greece the Right to Cut Off Türkiye's Continental Shelf?.

For background on this site, see About Horizon Politics: Mission, Method and Transparency, Editorial Principles: Sourcing, Attribution and the Fact–Position Divide, the Reader FAQ and the Horizon Politics home page.

Perspective Note

Horizon Politics presents Türkiye's official positions and legal arguments as a distinct perspective within the international debate, alongside competing views where relevant. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, official archives and public statements, so that readers can verify them independently.